The Anointing of Jesus

Transcript

GR 733
1/12/1986
The Anointing of Jesus
Matthew 26:1-16
Gil Rugh


As the Spirit of God directed in the recording of events of the earthly life and ministry of Christ, He provided four different accounts of Christ’s ministry on earth: Matthew, Mark, Luke and John. Each of these gospel writers presented their accounts from a perspective that differs a little from the others. Each of these accounts has a little different emphasis and stress. Three of them are similar; Matthew, Mark and Luke are called the synoptic gospels, synoptic meaning “to see together.” They see the life of Christ in a similar way. They cover much of the same material, and there are overlaps in much of the material covered in these gospels. The Gospel of John is different and unique. Ninety percent of the material in the Gospel of John is not recorded by the other gospel writers, but what is the same in all four gospels is they build to the same climax: the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ. They all move toward that ultimate point, the death of Jesus Christ because that is why He came. He came to give His life as a ransom for many. The real purpose of the ministry of Christ is realized in His death and resurrection because He is the One who will save His people from their sins. That can only be accomplished by His death on the cross.
Matthew 26, 27 and 28 turn the attention and focus to the events related to the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. At this point in the Gospel of Matthew, the presentation of Christ as the Messiah of Israel has concluded. Matthew has been writing to demonstrate that Jesus is the King of the Jews, but Israel would not have Him as their King, so that kingdom would not be established at that time. But Jesus is the King nonetheless. Even the events of His death and resurrection demonstrate that. The kingdom will not be established until a future time when the nation has been prepared by God to receive Jesus as their Christ or Messiah.
Matthew 26 begins with a phrase that Matthew used on five occasions in his Gospel. “When Jesus had finished all these words, He said to His disciples” (v. 1). Jesus had finished His discourse. Matthew presents five discourses of Christ, and he closed each of these discourses with a similar phrase. Matthew 26:1 is the conclusion of the Olivet Discourse of Matthew 24 and 25, dealing with the Second Coming of Christ.
In Matthew 5, 6, and 7, the Sermon on the Mount is the discourse in which Christ dealt with the character of those who will share in the Kingdom that He will establish. That discourse concludes in Matthew 7:28, “When Jesus had finished these words, the crowds were amazed at His teaching.” This expression marks the conclusion of that discourse.

Matthew 10 recorded the call of the disciples and then the teaching that Christ gave to them regarding being His followers. Matthew 11:1 concludes the teaching, “When Jesus had finished giving instructions to His twelve disciples, He departed from there to teach and preach in their cities.”
In Matthew 13 Jesus gave parables relating to the Kingdom. Matthew 13:53, “When Jesus had finished these parables, He departed from there.” The teaching was given in the form of parables so the unbeliever would not gain any added information and truth concerning the kingdom that Christ was talking about.
Then Matthew 19:1, “When Jesus had finished these words, He departed from Galilee and came into the region of Judea beyond the Jordan.” Jesus had been teaching on the importance of the individual before God and in the kingdom and on the matter of discipline. Because each individual is so important before God, it is important to reach out and draw them back to a right relationship with God and the matter of forgiveness is paramount in our relationships with one another.
Lastly, in Matthew 26:1 the final discourse of Christ as recorded by Matthew has drawn to a conclusion. This was within two days of the crucifixion of Jesus Christ and He pinpointed for the first time specifically when He was going to die. In Matthew 26:2 He told the disciples, “You know that after two days the Passover is coming, and the Son of Man is to be handed over for crucifixion.” This was two days before the Passover at which the Son of Man was crucified. Jesus talked about His coming death before. He made clear to His disciples that He has been rejected and the kingdom has been rejected and He was going to suffer and die at Jerusalem.
Matthew recorded this in Matthew 16:21, “From that time Jesus began to show His disciples that He must go to Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised up on the third day.” He very specifically laid out that He was going to die at Jerusalem at the hands of the leaders of the nation and be raised on the third day, but He did not pinpoint when that would happen. As Christ began to unfold this truth to the disciples, it caused problems. Peter took Christ aside and rebuked Him telling Him it couldn’t happen to Him. The disciples would have been grieved by His talk of death, but He kept reminding them His death would be followed by resurrection. Matthew 17:22-23, “And while they were gathering together in Galilee, Jesus said to them, ‘The Son of Man is going to be delivered into the hands of men; and they will kill Him, and He will be raised again on the third day.’ And they were deeply grieved.”
In Matthew 20:17 Christ was about to go to Jerusalem, and He took the disciples aside and told them, “Behold, we are going up to Jerusalem; and the Son of Man will be delivered to the chief priests and scribes, and they will condemn Him to death, and will hand Him over to
the Gentiles to mock and scourge and crucify Him, and on the third day He will be raised
up” (vv. 18-19). The disciples know that it will happen in Jerusalem, not too far away, at the hands of the religious leaders by crucifixion.
Then in Matthew 26 He told them just how near it was. He told them that in two days, at the Passover, the crucifixion would occur. The impact of this has escaped the disciples. They did not grasp what was going on, and when it happened they were in disarray and confusion; but nonetheless, He clearly and specifically told them. They ought to have been prepared, but they were not. This is just like us as believers: He has told us again and again in the Word of God that He is going to come for us; we are to be ready at any time, but I wonder if Christ were to come today, how many of us would be totally surprised. We would think we just never expected Him today. But He has told us over and over again. Well, maybe we just didn’t quite hear it; we didn’t really pay close attention; we heard it but it didn’t sink in. That’s the way the disciples were.
They didn’t quite come to grips with it.
Matthew then told about the leaders in Israel. Matthew 26:3-4, “Then the chief priests and the elders of the people were gathered together in the court of the high priest, named Caiaphas; and they plotted together to seize Jesus by stealth and kill Him.” I think the connection is that while Christ was prophesying about His coming death, the religious leaders were planning it. This was not the first time they talked about killing Christ, but they were working on more of the details and how to carry it out. So Christ said it would be in two days, at Passover; and the religious leaders gathered together at the home of Caiaphas to plot the death of Christ and to determine how they could carry it out with the least danger to themselves. Under the sovereign control of God, even the sinful desires of men are used to accomplish His purposes. This never excuses sin, but it shows that God is in control. And if God is not sovereignly in control over the sinful activities of man, then He is not in control of very much, is He? If men sin and God cannot control that, then we have little hope that God can bring this world to His desired conclusion because it is controlled by sinful men and populated by sinful people. But God, in His sovereignty, takes even the sinful desires of human beings and uses them to accomplish His purposes.

Peter explained this matter of bringing together the sovereignty of God and the crucifixion of Christ and the sinful acts of men. Acts 2:22-23, “Men of Israel, listen to these words: Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know-- this Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God, you nailed to a cross by the hands of godless men and put Him to death.” Peter told the Jews that they put Christ to death using godless men, the Romans, to nail Jesus to the cross, but that it was done according to the predetermined plan and foreknowledge of God. The grammatical construction indicates that foreknowledge refers to the same thing as predetermined plan, so the foreknowledge of God is the development of the foreordained plan of God. What God predetermined, He foreknew; and He had determined that His Son would be crucified. Jesus was the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world and yet God used sinful men to accomplish this. Did God make these people sin? No. They were set in their rebellion against Him, they wanted to get rid of Christ, and He used those sins to accomplish His purposes. It is remarkable how sovereignly in control God really is.
Matthew 26:3 refers to Caiaphas, the high priest. There are two men called high priests in the New Testament, Annas and Caiaphas. Annas was the high priest from A.D. 6 to A.D. 15, and then he was deposed by the Romans and replaced by his son-in-law, Caiaphas. Caiaphas was high priest from A.D. 18 to A.D. 36. The high priest was to be a lifetime position, only vacated by death; but when the Romans took control, they took authority for appointing the high priests of Israel so that they could have a man there who would carry out their wishes. So the high priest functioned as long as he kept the Jews in order, obeying the Romans and not causing any trouble. It helps you perceive how much of a schemer Caiaphas really was and what a great compromiser he was that he could function as high priest from A.D. 18 to A.D. 36. In the next approximately 30 years there were 28 high priests. None of them had the cunning of Caiaphas to keep things together. Caiaphas was very sensitive to any rioting on the part of the Jews and any problems caused by the Jews because one of the first things the Romans would do was to replace him, and Caiaphas was very jealous for his position. But since Annas had been high priest before him, he still retained the title and evidently a great deal of influence in these kinds of activities.
The chief priests and elders were plotting. “But they were saying, ‘Not during the festival, otherwise a riot might occur among the people’” (Matt. 26:5). They wanted it to occur behind the scenes, so to speak, in a way that it would not cause any problems among the people resulting in rebellion against the leadership. At Passover it is estimated that the population of Jerusalem increased by five times. People would come from all over to Jerusalem to celebrate the Passover. These people had heard of the fame of Jesus as a teacher and a healer. Many of them believed He was a prophet even though they did not accept Him as Messiah or as the Son of God. If the religious leaders would come and arrest Him and decide to have Him executed, it might cause a riot among the people. So they planned to wait until after the Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread that follows the Passover, and then after the holidays, when things quieted down, then they would arrest Him. But the plan of God was already determined: it would happen at Passover. In Matthew 26:2 Jesus told the disciples it would happen in two days at Passover, even while the Jews were saying, “not during the festival.” God used their sinful desires to accomplish His purposes at His time.
Caiaphas had already determined that the best way to handle the problem of Jesus was to execute Him. On a previous occasion he lectured the Sanhedrin on what it meant to be expedient. An event that happened some time prior to Matthew 26 is found in John 11:47-48: “Therefore the chief priests and the Pharisees convened a council, and were saying, ‘What are we doing? For this man is performing many signs. If we let Him go on like this, all men will believe in Him, and the Romans will come and take away both our place and our nation.’” They did not deny that He was doing the miraculous. He was doing many miracles. If they let Him go, everybody would be convinced that He was the Messiah. What would be wrong with that? The problem was, according to verse 48, that the Romans would come and take away both their place and their nation. They were afraid that if the nation began to turn to Jesus as the Christ, then the Romans would see this as a revolt against Rome and the Romans would come and get rid of the religious leaders and then destroy the nation. They were not even considering the evidence or the undeniability of the signs that were being done.
Caiaphas was a man who could get right to the point. “But one of them, Caiaphas, who was high priest that year, said to them, ‘You know nothing at all, nor do you take into account that it is expedient for you that one man die for the people, and that the whole nation not perish’” (John 11:49-50). Caiaphas’ solution was based on expediency. If by Jesus’ continued existence there was a danger that the leadership would lose its position and the nation would be shattered by the Romans, Caiaphas focused on what was expedient. He thought that if they were rid of the one man, they would save not only their own hides but also the nation. All they had to do was plan the murder of one man. What was the problem with that?
See how cold and calculating he was? He had no regard for the innocence of this man or with the fact that this man was in the midst of the nation performing mighty miracles. He was focused on the fact that it was expedient to get rid of Him. God was using Caiaphas to give a prophecy, and Caiaphas had no idea. Caiaphas meant to murder Him and save the nation and the leadership. John 11:51-52 says, “Now he did not say this on his own initiative, but being high priest that year, he prophesied that Jesus was going to die for the nation, and not for the nation only, but in order that He might also gather together into one the children of God who are scattered abroad.” In other words what Caiaphas said was really true, that one man was going to die for the nation, and not only for the nation but for all people whom God would draw to Himself. He meant it one way, but God meant it another way. God was using even the words of a sinful man, since he occupied the position of high priest, to give a prophecy that Christ’s death would provide salvation not only for Israel but also for all mankind that would believe in Him. From that day on they plotted the death of Christ.
This is the court before which Jesus would appear very shortly to be judged, with the head judge Caiaphas! They had already determined that He must die, and He would be standing before them to be judged as to whether He was worthy of death. This will help you understand something of the way the trials of Christ were handled. They had already determined the verdict and were just looking to find an excuse to render that verdict.
After this, Matthew included an event that happened earlier, but he put it in this place in his Gospel because of its importance in the betrayal of Christ by Judas. John 12 indicates that this event occurred six days before Passover, and in Matthew 26:2 Jesus said that the Passover would occur in two days. Matthew inserted it here because it is crucial to understanding how Judas came to betray Christ. The incident is the anointing of Christ by a woman at Bethany. “Now when Jesus was in Bethany, at the home of Simon the leper, a woman came to Him with an alabaster vial of very costly perfume, and she poured it on His head as He reclined at the table. But the disciples were indignant when they saw this, and said, ‘Why this waste? For this perfume might have been sold for a high price and the money given to the poor’” (Matt. 26:6-9).
This happened in Bethany, the eastern slopes of the Mount of Olives, where Mary, Martha and
Lazarus lived, and they were present on this occasion. Matthew clarified it as the home of Simon the leper, evidently a leper that had been cleansed by Christ and was having Him into his home. A woman that John identified as Mary, the sister of Martha, took a bottle of very expensive perfume and poured it onto the body of Christ. It was poured not only on His head but also the rest of His body according to the other gospels, and John stressed that the oil was poured on the feet of Christ. The disciples saw this and were indignant; they saw it as a waste. According to John’s gospel, this was worth almost a year’s salary for a workingman. And this woman took a vial of perfume that cost a year’s pay and broke the bottle and poured it over Christ so that the aroma filled the house. That’s it; it’s gone; it’s done; it’s finished. What a waste! The disciples thought that it would have been far better to sell it and give the money to the poor to help somebody; what good was it after it was poured out and wasted?
John gave a picture of the setting, including details of what happened to help you appreciate the circumstances that Matthew recorded. “Jesus, therefore, six days before the Passover, came to Bethany where Lazarus was, whom Jesus had raised from the dead” (John 12:1). They were at Bethany and Lazarus, Mary and Martha were present in the home of Simon. Martha was involved in serving, and that’s characteristic of Martha. When we find her, she’s busy; and in the home of Simon, she was serving.
They made Jesus a supper there and Lazarus was there at the table. “Mary then took a pound of very costly perfume of pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped His feet with her hair; and the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume” (John 12:3). Imagine the great sacrifice on the part of Mary. She came in the midst of this scene and poured this perfume, this ointment, on Christ, and then she took her hair and dried the feet of Christ. This was an act of humility by Mary, totally humbling herself in absolute commitment to Him, to take down her hair and to wipe His feet. In 1 Corinthians 11, it says the hair is the glory of the woman. There was no reservation on her part, either with what she has or with what she is.
This was an act of absolute devotion, but then the disciples complained. “But Judas Iscariot, one of His disciples, who was intending to betray Him, said, ‘Why was this perfume not sold for three hundred denarii and given to poor people?’ Now he said this, not because he was concerned about the poor, but because he was a thief, and as he had the money box, he used to pilfer what was put into it” (John 12:4-6). Matthew and Mark, in their account, said that “the disciples,” plural, “criticized and condemned Mary” for her acts of devotion. John identified Judas as the instigator of the complaint and said that he led the way in the criticism.
This gives a more complete picture. Mary came in and performed this act of loving devotion. Judas was appalled at the idea that he had lost the occasion to steal some of this money. He was the treasurer for the group, and as money came into the group they would give it to Judas to keep and to pay for their expenses, to buy provisions as needed, and Judas proceeded to help himself. The perfume was worth 300 denarii. One denarii was the pay for one day’s labor in biblical times, so 300 denarii was close to a full year’s pay. He had an opportunity to get 300 denarii, and it would not have been often that he would have had opportunity to get that kind of money in their treasury, but it had been wasted. He said the money could have been given to the poor, but he didn’t have any concern or love of the poor; he was a thief! The tragedy in this was that the disciples followed the lead of Judas in condemning Mary and saying it would have been better used for the poor!
Note that Judas spent three years in the most intimate kind of contact with Jesus Christ but was unmoved and unaffected by the ministry of Christ. That is almost frightening that he could be exposed personally to the teaching of the Son of God in the flesh, in those closest kind of settings, over a period of years, and watch that perfect, sinless life lived day after day and see the miracles done, but during it all he was a thief. Nothing touched his heart; nothing moved him. He was only in it because it was personally profitable to him. Also note that the disciples never had an inkling that Judas was not really a believer. They trusted him with the money. When he complained about the perfume, the disciples didn’t contradict him. They agreed that it would have been far better to use that money for spiritual purposes and more good than just pouring it out on Christ. They were deceived by Judas. And these men who had been with Christ for three years said it was a waste to pour such expensive perfume on Him. They had no understanding of the commitment and love and devotion being expressed by Mary. They did not understand the significance of this one moment in history.
Sometimes people ask me if I get discouraged when people sit under my ministry week after week after week and their lives don’t seem to be changed. I say yes, that is discouraging; but I am reminded of Judas. It causes me great concern that you can be exposed to the Word of God week after week after week, and yet, like Judas, be a son of destruction. Judas was exposed to the Son of God, day in and day out, for three years, yet he was destined to die and spend eternity in hell. That’s frightening.
My fear is that there are people who hear this message and sit in the middle of the congregation; and other people see them and think they are good members of this congregation so they must be saved. Yet, on the inside, there has never been a change. They are just like Judas. They may have fooled everyone. Right down to the end, at the Last Supper, the disciples never guessed that Judas was the one. But his heart had never been changed.
Only I know my heart before God. Only I know if I have really come to recognize that I am a sinner without hope and that Jesus Christ in love died for me. Only I know if, without reservation, I have placed my full confidence and trust in Him and His death for me as payment for my sin. That makes all the difference. You can sit and hear the Word of God week after week after week and be as religious as you can be and yet be just like Judas. That will happen to some who hear this message, I’m afraid, as it happened to Judas.
We need to be very careful not to follow the pattern of the disciples of being insensitive to what really matters spiritually. Sometimes we develop a critical spirit as believers. We think there would have been more spiritual things for others to do with the money. We think it would have been more spiritual if others had done something else. But we need to be careful because sometimes it is our own crassness that is being revealed, not spirituality at all. There was nothing more spiritual at that moment than to pour the perfume on Jesus Christ, and Mary was honored for it.

Jesus intervened in Matthew 26:10, “But Jesus, aware of this, said to them, ‘Why do you bother the woman? For she has done a good deed to Me.’” Let me ask you, is there anything more important than doing good to Christ? Isn’t that what life is all about, honoring Him? These are the disciples that have walked with Him for three years. I can understand Judas’ reaction because he never came to believe. But the disciples were following the lead of a godless unbeliever, the son of perdition, and criticizing this great act of devotion.
Jesus said this was a unique event. “For you always have the poor with you; but you do not always have Me.” (Matt. 26:11). He was not saying you shouldn’t do anything for the poor. We should. He was saying they would have many occasions to do nice things for the poor, but this was a unique event, an occasion in history! The opportunity to do this for Christ would not be an opportunity that could be repeated! They just did not have their spiritual eyes open, but Mary did.
Mary seemed to perceive and understand what was going on for Jesus said in Matthew 26:12, “For when she poured this perfume on My body, she did it to prepare Me for burial.” He
indicated that Mary understood something of the events that were unfolding. Mary appears three times in the gospels, and all three times she was at the feet of Christ. This may indicate where she got her spiritual perception. Everybody else was running around being busy; Mary was there with complete devotion to Him. She recognized the seriousness of the moment and took advantage of it. She poured out the perfume and anointed His body.
Mary did something that no one else in all of history ever on the face of the earth will have the privilege of doing: anointing the body of Christ for burial. It was customary in biblical times after a person died to take the body and prepare it with various perfumes and spices. When Christ died on the cross, there was no time for that. They had to bury Him unprepared. Some of the gospel accounts indicate that very early on the first day of the week they came with the spices and ointments they had prepared intending to anoint His body for burial. But it was too late, the resurrection had occurred. The only anointing the body of Christ received was when she used the expensive ointment “to prepare Me for burial.” What an honor. What a privilege! The disciples were lamenting that they could have used that money for the poor, and Judas wished that he could have gotten his hands on it. If you have ever wondered how important that event was, read Matthew 26:13, “Truly I say to you, wherever this gospel is preached in the whole world, what this woman has done will also be spoken of in memory of her.”
This statement indicates that this event was important but it also indicates that Christ recognized His crucifixion wasn’t the end and He told the disciples that. Gospel means good news, so wherever this gospel, or the good news--what did He mean the good news, He was going to die in two days by crucifixion! Yes, and then this good news about Him would be proclaimed in the whole world! Not just Palestine! The whole world. Jesus prophesied that people would talk about Mary’s act of devotion. Did that prophecy come true? 2,000 years later, in a totally different part of the world, we are talking about how wonderful the act of Mary was. Not that we are exalting Mary, but we are just doing what Christ said, speaking of what she did, in memory of her. What devotion, what love, what spiritual perception! The poor thickheaded disciples were not alert to what was going on, but Mary’s act of devotion showed her spiritual perception. Isn’t it amazing how specific Christ was? Who would have thought on that day, just days before His crucifixion, that they would be talking about spreading the good news all over the world and talking about what Mary would do? Who would have ever thought back then that 2,000 years later, and in a totally unknown part of the world, people would be talking about how wonderful Mary’s act of devotion was? Yet that’s exactly what we’re doing. Mary indicated her devotion and her love, but it was to prepare the way for something.
Judas was frustrated. He saw one of his significant chances for great monetary gain wasted, and he had come to the end of his rope. He seized the opportunity to make money on Christ one way or the other. Matthew 26:14-15 says, “Then one of the twelve, named Judas Iscariot, went to the chief priests and said ‘What are you willing to give me to betray Him to you?’” It seems that it was this occasion of seeing Christ approve of what he considered a waste and then rebuke him for speaking against it that caused him to decide that he would turn to the chief priests to see if they would pay him to deliver Christ into their hands. He asked the chief priests what they would give him. Christ had no value to Judas. He was of overwhelming worth to Mary. She was willing to give everything regardless of cost. Judas was willing to betray Christ if it would benefit him monetarily.
The chief priests were willing to pay: Matthew 26:15 concludes, “And they weighed out thirty pieces of silver to him.” Judas was one from the inner band who would be able to tell the chief priests when would be a good time to arrest Christ. He would be there in the quiet times and in the upper room. He would know about going to the garden in the evening. This way the chief priests would not have to try to follow Him and find a time when there was no crowd around to seize Him. For that kind of inside information, they were willing to pay 30 pieces of silver. They weighed it out to Judas; they paid him in advance.
He has made his commitment; he has gotten his price. “From then on he began looking for a good opportunity to betray Jesus.” (Matt. 26:16). He was worth 30 pieces of silver to Judas. According to the Old Testament, 30 pieces of silver was the value of a slave. Exodus 21:32 gives that as the price for the loss of a slave, “If the ox gores a male or female slave, the owner shall give his or her master thirty shekels of silver . . .” God specifically prophesied the price that would be placed on Christ in Zechariah 11:12-13, “I said to them, ‘If it is good in your sight, give me my wages; but if not, never mind!’ So they weighed out thirty shekels of silver as my wages. Then the Lord said to me, ‘Throw it to the potter, that magnificent price at which I was valued by them.’ So I took the thirty shekels of silver and threw them to the potter in the house of the Lord.” Zechariah was being used as a picture of the coming Messiah, and they valued Him at 30 pieces of silver. That magnificent price for the Son of God, the Messiah of Israel. The religious leadership of the nation Israel decided it was worth 30 pieces of silver to them if Judas would deliver Him.
Judas took it, but he ended up full of remorse as he saw the crucifixion and he returned to throw it back to them. They took those 30 pieces of silver and bought a potter’s field. It’s exactly what Zechariah said centuries before. Judas ended up as nothing and he self-destructed, condemned
for eternity. What excuse does he have? Jesus said it would be better for that man if he had not been born. He was exposed to the glorious Savior but was hardened to say ‘No’ to His salvation. The result? Destruction.
What a contrast drawn between Judas and Mary. Mary exemplified unreserved devotion. She showed that nothing was too costly or too extravagant for her Lord. Nothing was too humbling for her. To bow down and wipe His feet with her hair was an honor, a privilege! She gave Him everything! Do I have Mary’s attitude? Is that what moves me?
What is more important than Christ? What would be too costly for you? How do you really view Jesus Christ? Is He more important than everything and anything? What if I lose my possessions, my health, my family, my wife? Is He worth everything? That was the way Mary approached it. We need to be more like Mary. Even the disciples became dull and insensitive. They didn’t realize the importance of the moment. I think we sometimes go through life on that level. Jesus Christ may be coming today. He may be coming tomorrow. I don’t know where I am in history from God’s perspective. The opportunities I have now may not be repeated. They may not come again. Am I really taking advantage of them? Am I really seizing those opportunities? Is my focal point Jesus Christ?
Mary was totally devoted; she was not thinking, ‘If I pour out this expensive perfume, what will I have next year. I may need this money.’ No, she was totally absorbed with Him. It’s a good thing because a few days later there was no other opportunity. This was a once in a lifetime opportunity. If I look at my life like that, it helps me live more on the edge. I have opportunities to talk with people that I may never have again. I may have opportunity to worship Jesus Christ that I will never have again. This may be the last time. Do I take advantage of it or do I just pass it by?
As they sat at the table with Christ, the disciples just weren’t thinking. They had lots of meals like this one occasion with Christ. They didn’t realize how close to the end it was. Sometimes we walk through life that way. We want to be more like Mary, not like the disciples. Above all, you don’t want to be like Judas who was exposed to the truth but went into eternity without Christ. If you go into eternity without Christ, you deserve it. You of all people deserve it because you have been exposed to the Word of God; you have heard of the Savior who loved you and died for you. You have no one to blame but your own stubborn sinfulness if you don’t come to believe in Him and experience His salvation.
Isn’t it amazing how gracious He is? He came to provide salvation for us. His desire is not that we be destroyed but that we be forgiven, but that means we must come to believe. When did you come to believe that Jesus Christ loved you and died for you? If you have not, you can do it right now. If you have come to believe that Jesus Christ died for you, does your life indicate it? Are you like Mary? The best that you have is not good enough. Are you willing to give it all at any time for Him and His honor?